Stone Blind
Sunday, July 19, 2026
I picked up Stone Blind expecting Medusa’s story, but somehow she felt more like a side character in her own book. For someone whose name and tragedy feel so central, she often seemed like just dust floating in the lives and chaos of the gods. Strangely enough, Athene had so much exposure that part of me felt like Athene should’ve been the title instead.
The book jumps through so many points of view: gods, creatures, mortals, and even a crow and an olive tree (which honestly surprised me). Sometimes it was interesting, but at times it felt too much, especially when all I wanted was more of Medusa. What stood out to me most was how awful the gods were. The story is filled with lust, greed, power, revenge, assault, and cruelty. It made me realize how dark and messy Greek mythology really is. The gods felt less divine and more painfully flawed.
Perseus also frustrated me. He came across as arrogant and too full of himself, always thinking and speaking highly of who he is, almost trapped in this hero mindset. He didn’t seem to care much about others either. But at the same time, I can’t fully blame him because part of what drives him is wanting to protect his mother. I just kept thinking there had to be another way.
Even with my frustrations, I still think Stone Blind is a good place to start if you want to understand Greek mythology better. It gives you a glimpse of the gods, their chaos, and the complicated stories around them. In the end, I enjoyed parts of it, but I think I expected more Medusa and less everyone else.



0 comments